![]() ![]() Having good code coverage gives us confidence that we haven’t broken any existing functionality. In the world of Source Control systems, we don’t need the code which is not being used. If we need to add a new functionality, we can rather create a new class than to overload the existing class. Ideally a class should have one responsibility. If there is a problem in the original code, we basically end up propagating it across our application. Keeping our methods short and crisp, makes our code easier to understand and maintain.ĬTRL-C and CTRL-V can be our enemy sometimes. Some of the common code smells are - Long Method In simple terms, we can define it as bad practices or design flaws, which might require attention, either immediately or at a later point of time.īuilding up Technical Debt is always a red flag and the earlier we identify and fix issues, the better it is. ![]() How do we ‘ smell’ the various issues with the code? This makes the role of a Code Reviewer critical. ![]() Complying with coding standards helps us to keep our Technical Debt in check.īut how do we ensure that our review process is efficient? Apart from verifying the functionality, what are the other things a code reviewer needs to look for?Ī developer might have made the correct functional changes, but he/she might have violated some fundamental design principles/coding standards. ![]() Finding defects at an earlier stage helps us in avoiding complexities post deployment.There are multifold benefits of having a stringent code review in place – In a development life cycle, Code Reviews play an essential role to gauge the quality of a product. In this blog, we will try to understand the importance of code reviews, classify types of design flaws and identify the code smells using Visual Studio Code Metrics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |